🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

According to recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee earning moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I can name multiple businesses who are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments include pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When you add those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many federal military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.